OSH Security Practice Test

Circumstantial evidence is indeed the correct choice because it refers to evidence that relies on an inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact. This type of evidence suggests a fact or a series of facts without directly proving it. For instance, if one finds a wet umbrella in a room, it can be circumstantially inferred that it has been raining outside, even though there’s no direct evidence of the rain.

In contrast, similar fact evidence usually involves the introduction of prior acts or events that are similar to the case at hand, but it serves a different purpose and is specifically used to show a pattern of behavior. Documentary evidence refers to written or recorded materials presented to support facts in a court case. None of these alternatives accurately defines evidence that relates to a series of facts rather than the specific fact in question. Thus, circumstantial evidence is accurately characterized by the description provided in the question.